National Voluntary Cleanup Programs (VCP) Memorandum of Understanding (MOA) are agreements between CEPOL regional authorities and government environmental programmes that promote coordination and define general roles in site clean-up. The agreement can also give public opinion confidence that CEPOL and the public authority work in a coordinated manner. Over time, the use of MOAs as a mechanism for strengthening EPAs and government coordination at contaminated sites has grown. The BCA will investigate and clean up the site. To the extent that one or more CCA applicants meet the definition of a participant (see ECL 27-1405 (1) (a)), the BCA also provides for the review and treatment of contamination that has leaked from the site outside the site. Some MOAs and RCRA Memoranda of Understanding (MOUs) have included a means of recognizing the contribution that PCCs or other government programs can make to combat underground cleaning and processing and storage facilities (TSDs) and underground storage tanks regulated by the RCRA Conservation and Recovery Act and contaminated sites that are sanctified in accordance with the Act Act. In 2002, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) was amended by the Brownfields Amendments, which allow states and tribes that enter into epa to receive grants to the response program approved by Section 128 (a) (1) of CERCLA. Visit the corresponding regional page by clicking on the map below to get the current list of these MOAs and MOUs. The draft guidelines do not address some of the important issues raised by the 2015 amendments. One of the threshold changes in the 2015 legislation was the revision of the definition of „brown field site” to require proof of contamination on the site to „values exceeding soil cleaning objectives or other sanitary or environmental standards, criteria or guidelines… applicable on the basis of the reasonably expected use of the property. (ECL 27-1405 (2)). Although the draft guidelines state that the information contained in the notification „must be sufficient to establish that the area meets the definition of a fallow area and that the site must be rehabilitated,” it does not provide additional guidance on how to proceed with such a provision.

This omission is remarkable because, in practice, dec interpreted the 2015 amendments so that applicants would be required to demonstrate such a demonstration with on-site contamination data that went beyond current cleaning standards. Websites that entered the original PCO (i.e. before July 1, 2008) before December 31, 2017 and did not receive a Certificate of Completion („COC”) before December 31, 2017 are of considerable importance, are automatically subject to the PCO „Generation 3” and the corresponding rules.