In the workplace, superiors and managers take care of the discipline of employees and the termination of the employment relationship under market conditions through the Human Resources DEPARTMENT if the company has one. In such cases, dismissals and disciplinary measures must be carried out by staff members who are trained and certified to do so legally. The aim is to protect the employer from legal remedies that workers may have elsewhere if it can be proved that such disciplinary measures or dismissals have not been implemented in accordance with the latest labour laws. For employees in a unionized environment, delegates can represent the employee, while the human resources department represents the company, so that both parties are more equal and can resolve problems externally through informal negotiations or a complaint, saving both parties time and money. In this case, external comparisons mean that an employee and a supervisor each have a qualified lawyer. A competing transaction is a transaction in which both parties act in their own interest. This means that they have negotiated the price fairly and neither party gives the other an agreement that is better or worse than what the market would dictate due to an existing relationship between them. It is specifically used in contract law to agree on an agreement that resists legal review, even though the parties may have common interests (e.g.B. employers-workers) or be too closely related to be considered fully independent (e.g.B the parties have family ties). A comparative price is a price that a willing buyer and seller would reasonably agree with if the buyer tried to get the lowest possible price and the seller tried to get the highest possible price. It is also important, for a competing transaction, that there is no undue pressure on one of the parties and that both parties all have the same necessary information.

The sale of real estate from parents to children is a simple example of the sale of real estate from parents to children. Parents might want to sell the property to their children at a price below market value, but such a transaction could later be considered by a court as a gift and not a bona foi bargain, which could have different tax and legal consequences. To avoid such a classification, the parties must demonstrate that the transaction was not carried out otherwise than it would have been for an arbitrary third party. This could be done, for example, by the appointment of a disinterested third party, such as for example. B from an expert or broker, who could give a professional opinion that the sale price is reasonable and reflects the actual value of the property. The full-length principle is also necessary for transactions that might not be fully and fairly negotiated. For example, a buyer of a company that will continue to operate with the seller`s group wants to ensure that the business he has acquired concludes these transactions under impeccable conditions. This is usually reflected in a seller`s warranty, which states that all transactions are carried out on an at-your-best basis. If the guarantee appears to be incorrect, the buyer or the acquired company should be entitled to damages, since the difference between market prices and transfer prices may be subject to an Ebit or Ebida multiplier. The seller may also be able to negotiate an agreement under which all business-to-business relationships end on the closing date, with the exception of certain identified and agreed contracts….